Islamic Jurisprudence Rules Dynamics in Justifying, Correcting and Completing Banking Transactions

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Associate Professor of Fiqh and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, University of Tehran (Farabi Campus), Qom, Iran; Email: myasrebi@ut.ac.ir.

Abstract

This article examines the application of Islamic jurisprudential rules in the context of Islamic banking, employing a moderate approach grounded in practical experience and investigation. The article explores various topics, including the rules of "Kul Qardh Jarr Manfa’ah Fahuwa Riba"[1], "Sihat"[2], "Akal Māl bi Bātil"[3], "Maqbūdh bi Aqd Fāsid"[4], "Nafy-e Qharar"[5], "Al-Uqūd Tābi’ah lil-Qusūd"[6], "Al-Muminūn Ind Shurūtihim"[7], and "Istīmān"[8] with deference to their implications in banking contracts, banking transactions and regulations of non-usurious banking operations. Recruiting a descriptive-analytical approach, the article delves more exclusively into the status of these rules in banking civil partnership and Mudhāribah[9] contracts.
 
[1] the prohibition of the interest included in a loan as dirty money.
[2] principle of validity of transactions.
[3] Acquisition of a property using dishonest techniques.
[4] Property acquired through a corrupt contract because the conditions for the validity of the contract were blatantly disregarded.
[5] The prohibition of fraudulent transactions, especially where the seller is aware of the fraud.
[6] According to this rule, the element of intention is an essential component in transaction contracts.
[7] According to this rule, it is obligatory that Muslims remain faithful to their promises in a transaction contract.
[8] According to this rule, the individual is liable to the damages inflicted on the property he is entrusted with.
[9] It’s a kind of contract where the profit is divided between the contractor and the investor.

Yasrebi, S.A.M. (2023) Dynamics of Islamic Jurisprudential Rules in the Justification, Modification, and Completion of Banking Transactions. Journal of New Perspectives in Islamic Jurisprudence, 1 (1) 1-15. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22091/RCJL.2023.9858.1027.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
The Holy Quran.
Hur Ameli, M. bin H. (1409 AH). Vasāil al-Shia. Qom: Al al-Beyt Publishing House.
Safi Golpayegani, L. (1412 AH). Jāmi al-Ahkām. Qom: The Office of Ayatollah Safi Golpayegani.
Tariji, F. bin M. A. (1416 AH). Majma al-Bahrein. Tehran: Mortazavi Publication.
Kuleini, M. bin Y. (1407 AH). Kāfi. Tehran: Dar al-Kitab.
Maraghi, A. Q. (1417 Ah). Anāwīn al-Usūl. Qom: Islamic Publishing House.
Makarem Shirazi, N. (1379 AH). al-Qisas al-Fiqhiyyah. Qom: Academy of Imam Ali bin Abi Talib (AS).
Mousavi Khomeini, R. (1412 AH). Kitāb al-Bai’. Qom: Ismailian Publication.
Najafi, M. H. (1415 AH). Jawāhir al-Kalām. Beirut: Institute for the Cultural Revival of Islamic Traditions.
Naraghi, A. bin M. M. (1417 AH). Awāid. Qom: Islamic Publishing House.
Nazarpour, M. T., & Mollapour, F. (2017). Application of Islamic jurisprudential rules in a sample of banking contracts. Tehran: Research Institute of Finance and Banking.
Yasrebi, S. A. M. (2016). Jurisprudence of forced guarantee in public and private criminal law. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Yasrebi, S. A. M. (2019). Comprehensive Argumentative Jurisprudence Rules. Tehran: Mizan.