A Fiqhi-Legal Analysis of the Imam's Discretionary Authority (Takh-yīr) in Adjudicating the Fixed Punishment (Ḥudūd) Crimes of Non-Muslims

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

Given its universalist nature, Islamic criminal law faces complex questions regarding its interaction with the crimes committed by non-Muslims. A central inquiry is whether the ḥudūd (Fixed Punishment) crimes of non-Muslims are adjudicated identically to those of Muslims, or if a distinct paradigm exists. This issue necessitates precise fiqhi examination, particularly in light of its potential conflicts with contemporary legal principles. Employing a descriptive-analytical method within a fiqhi-ijtihādī (juristic-inferencial) framework, this study analyzes the theory of the Imam's Discretionary Authority (Naẓarīyah al-Takh-yīr al-Imām) as a proposed juristic solution. The findings indicate that the Islamic ruler is vested with the authority, in cases of ḥudūd crimes involving non-Muslims, to either adjudicate the crime according to Islamic law (Shari'a) or to refer the offenders to their own communal courts to be punished according to their religious law. The evidence (adilla) for this theory is derived from Verse 42 of Surah al-Mā'idah, relevant narrations (riwāyāt), scholarly consensus (ijmāʿ), and the inherent stipulations of the pact of protection (ʿaqd al-dhimmah). The scope of this theory encompasses all ḥudūd crimes without restriction to a specific penalty. However, it is applicable only to Ahl al-Dhimmah (protected non-Muslim citizens) and Mustā'minūn (temporary residents under safe conduct). If the crime is committed publicly, the implementation of the Islamic ḥudūd becomes mandatory. In its application, the theory encounters apparent challenges when measured against contemporary legal principles, such as the rule of law, the equality of individuals before the law, and the standardization of legal codes and judicial procedures. Within the Iranian legal system, despite certain statutory limitations, Article 167 of the Iranian Constitution provides a potential avenue for the application of this theory. To enhance its efficacy, the study proposes the enactment of specific legislation or the establishment of specialized judicial bodies. The theory of the Imam's Discretionary Authority can serve as a model for the interaction of an Islamic State with its non-Muslim citizens and for addressing criminality within multicultural societies.

Highlights

**Conclusion**

This research, through an examination of the theory of the Imam's discretionary authority (*nazariyyah al-takhyīr al-Imām*) in dealing with the *ḥudūd* crimes (crimes with fixed punishments) of non-Muslims, has analyzed its jurisprudential proofs and delineated its scope of application. The findings indicate that this theory is rooted in the consensus (*ijmāʿ*) of jurists, verse 42 of Surah al-Ma'idah, and authentic narrations. It grants the Islamic ruler discretionary power when adjudicating the crimes of non-Muslims, allowing him to choose between applying Islamic *ḥudūd* or referring the case to their own religious courts. The scope of this theory encompasses all legal cases brought before the Islamic ruler. Furthermore, it applies specifically to *ahl al-dhimmah* (protected non-Muslim subjects) and *mustaʾmins* (non-Muslims under temporary safe conduct). In cases where a crime is committed openly and publicly, the application of Islamic *ḥudūd* becomes mandatory.

As a jurisprudential-legal theory, the theory of discretionary authority faces several challenges in its adaptation to contemporary legal principles. These challenges stem primarily from its apparent conflict with foundational legal principles such as the rule of law, equality before the law, and the unification of laws and judicial procedures. Within the Iranian legal system, which is based on Shia jurisprudence, although positive laws have limited judicial discretion, the principles of the Constitution—particularly Articles 4 and 167—provide the potential to utilize the capacities of this theory. An analysis of these challenges reveals that the theory of discretionary authority does not negate legal principles. Rather, within the framework of the Islamic legal system, it can function as a flexible mechanism for realizing judicial justice.

However, the successful implementation of this theory necessitates the formulation of specific laws, the establishment of specialized institutions, and the delineation of precise regulations to prevent misuse and guarantee the rights of all citizens. Furthermore, this research highlights the importance of the Islamic government's interaction with non-Muslims within the framework of Islamic law. It demonstrates that the theory of the Imam's discretionary authority can be considered as a model for managing *ḥudūd* crimes in multicultural societies.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

In Persian and Arabic
The Holy Quran
Al-Ḥakīm, S. M. (1995). Ḥaqāʾiq al-uṣūl [The realities of the principles]. Al-Manār Institute.
Al-Ḥillī, Ḥ. ibn Y. (ʿAllāmah). (1993). Qawāʿid al-aḥkām fī maʿrifat al-ḥalāl wa al-ḥarām [Rules of rulings in knowing the lawful and the forbidden]. Islamic Publications Office.
Al-Ḥillī, Ḥ. ibn Y. (ʿAllāmah). (1999). Taḥrīr al-aḥkām al-sharʿīyah ʿalā madhhab al-Imāmīyah [The drafting of the legal rulings according to the Imami school]. Imām Ṣādiq Institute.
Al-Ḥillī, J. ibn Ḥ. (Muḥaqqiq). (1988). Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām [The codes of Islam]. Ismāʿīlīyān.
Al-Ḥillī, M. ibn M. (Ibn Idrīs). (1996). Al-Sarāʾir al-ḥāwī li-taḥrīr al-fatāwā [The secrets encompassing the drafting of legal opinions]. Islamic Publishing Institute.
Al-Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī, M. ibn Ḥ. (1988). Wasāʾil al-Shīʿah [The means of the Shia]. Āl al-Bayt Institute.
Al-Kulaynī, M. ibn Y. (1987). Al-Kāfī [The sufficient]. Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyah.
Al-Mufīd, M. ibn M. (1990). Al-Muqniʿah [The persuader]. The International Congress on the Millennium of Sheikh al-Mufid.
Al-Ṭabarī, M. ibn J. (2001). Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān [The compendium of clarity on the interpretation of the verses of the Qur'an]. Dar al-Hijr for Printing and Publishing.
Al-Ṭūsī, M. ibn Ḥ. (1967). Al-Mabsūṭ fī fiqh al-Imāmīyah [The extensive work in Imami jurisprudence]. Al-Murtaḍawīyah Library.
Al-Ṭūsī, M. ibn Ḥ. (1987). Al-Khilāf [The disagreements]. Islamic Publishing Institute.
Al-Ṭūsī, M. ibn Ḥ. (1987). Tahdhīb al-aḥkām [The refinement of the rulings]. Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyah.
Al-ʿĀmilī, Z. ibn ʿA. (al-Shahīd al-Thānī). (1993). Masālik al-afhām [The paths of understanding]. Al-Maʿārif al-Islāmīyah Institute.
Al-ʿĀmilī, Z. ibn ʿA. (al-Shahīd al-Thānī). (1995). Tamhīd al-qawāʿid al-uṣūlīyah wa al-ʿArabīyah[Paving the way for the fundamental and Arabic rules]. Islamic Promotion Office of the Qom Seminary.
Al-ʿIrāqī, Ḍ. (n.d.). Sharḥ Tabṣirat al-mutaʿallimīn (Al-Qaḍāʾ) [Explanation of "The Enlightenment for Students" (Judiciary)].Mehr Press.
Anṣārī, M. (1998). Farāʾid al-uṣūl [The unique pearls of the principles]. Islamic Thought Forum.
Ardabīlī, A. ibn M. (1983). Majmaʿ al-fāʾidah wa al-burhān [The compendium of benefit and proof]. Islamic Publishing Institute.
Fāḍil Lankarānī, M. (2006). Tafṣīl al-sharīʿah fī sharḥ Taḥrīr al-wasīlah [Detailing the law in explaining "The Liberation of the Means"]. Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprudential Center.
Fakhr al-Muḥaqqiqīn al-Ḥillī, M. ibn Ḥ. (1967). Iḍāḥ al-fawāʾid fī sharḥ mushkilāt al-qawāʿid [Clarification of the benefits in explaining the problems of the principles]. Ismāʿīlīyān.
Gulpāyigānī, M. R. (n.d.). Al-Durr al-manḍūd fī aḥkām al-ḥudūd [The strung pearls regarding the rulings of the fixed punishments]. Dār al-Qurʾān al-Karīm.
Haji Dehabadi, A. (2016). The authority or non-authority of Principle 167 of the Constitution in criminal matters with a look at the 2013 Islamic Penal Code. Journal of Jurisprudential Research, 12(2), 257-288.
Hāshimī Shāhrūdī, S. M. (2003). Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence According to the School of Ahl al-Bayt. The Institute of Islamic Jurisprudence Encyclopedia.
Ibn al-Athīr, M. ibn M. (1988). Al-Nihāyah fī gharīb al-ḥadīth wa al-athar [The ultimate guide to unfamiliar narrations and traditions]. Ismāʿīlīyān.
Ibn al-Barrāj, ʿA. (1986). Al-Muhadhdhab [The refined]. Islamic Publishing Institute.
Ibn Kathīr, I. ibn ʿU. (2001). Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿaẓīm [Interpretation of the Great Qur'an]. Dār Ṭayyibah for Publishing and Distribution.
Imāmī, M. (2006). Occasions of Revelation of Qur'anic Verses. Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib School.
Javādī Āmulī, ʿA. (1984). Khams rasāʾil (Niẓām al-qaḍāʾ fī al-Islām) [Five treatises (The judicial system in Islam)]. Islamic Publishing Foundation.
Javādī Āmulī, ʿA. (2023). Advanced Fiqh Course [Lecture notes].
Khomeinī, S. R. (n.d.). Taḥrīr al-wasīlah [The liberation of the means]. The Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works.
Makārim Shīrāzī, N. (1995). Tafsīr-i nimūnah [The exemplary interpretation]. Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyah.
Muḥaqqiq al-Karakī, ʿA. ibn Ḥ. (1994). Jāmiʿ al-maqāṣid fī sharḥ al-qawāʿid [The comprehensive of objectives in explaining the principles]. Āl al-Bayt Institute.
Muḥaqqiq Ardabīlī, A. (1983). Majmaʿ al-fāʾidah wa al-burhān [The compendium of benefit and proof]. Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī. (Original work published 1403ق)
Muntaẓirī, Ḥ. (1988). Dirāsāt fī wilāyat al-faqīh wa fiqh al-dawlah al-Islāmīyah [Studies in the guardianship of the jurist and the jurisprudence of the Islamic state]. The Global Center for Islamic Studies.
Najafī, M. Ḥ. (1981). Jawāhir al-kalām [The jewels of discourse]. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī.
Qazi Shari'at Panahi, S. A. (2004). Essentials of Constitutional Law. Mizan Publishing.
Sayfī Māzandarānī, ʿA. A. (2004). Mabānī al-fiqh al-faʿʿāl fī al-qawāʿid al-fiqhīyah al-asāsīyah [Foundations of dynamic jurisprudence in the fundamental jurisprudential rules]. Islamic Publications Office of the Qom Seminary Teachers Society.
Ṭabāṭabāʾī Karbalāʾī, ʿA. (1984). Riyāḍ al-masāʾil fī bayān al-aḥkām bi-al-dalāʾil [The gardens of issues in stating the rulings with proofs]. Āl al-Bayt Institute.
Ṭabāṭabāʾī, S. M. Ḥ. (1973). Al-Mīzān fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān [The balance in the interpretation of the Qur'an]. Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī. (Original work published 1393ق)
Ṭabāṭabāʾī, S. M. Ḥ. (1999). Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an (M. B. Mousavi, Trans.). Islamic Publications Office.
Tabrīzī, J. (1996). Asās al-ḥudūd wa al-taʿzīrāt [The foundations of fixed and discretionary punishments]. Author's Office
In English and French
Cornu, G. (2002). Vocabulaire juridique (7th ed.). Presses Universitaires de France.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Raz, J. (1979). The authority of law: Essays on law and morality. Clarendon Press.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 April 2025
  • Revise Date: 12 June 2025
  • Accept Date: 30 September 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics