نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه فقه و حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان. تبریز. ایران
2 استاد گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه سمنان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
"Divergent jurisprudential opinions and conflicting rulings regarding the marriage of mature and prudent (*Rashida*) girls have led to the formation of restrictive legal frameworks. This is despite the fact that Islamic Sharia considers marriage a natural right for prudent individuals and has devised numerous incentive policies to facilitate it. The 'Principle of Justice', as the *Regula Regularum* (Rule of Rules) of the Islamic legal system, necessitates the observance of the fair rights of this group in their most crucial life choice. Utilizing a descriptive-analytical method, this research examines three major jurisprudential perspectives and evaluates their compliance with the 'Principle of Justice' criterion. The findings indicate that the theory of the 'Autonomy of Prudent Girls' (*Istiqlal*)—as a prominent (*Mashhur*) jurisprudential view—not only possesses argumentative consistency and robust jurisprudential foundations but is also fully compatible with the principle of Islamic justice. This principle negates all forms of discrimination and oppression while emphasizing human dignity and the natural right of rational and prudent individuals in choosing a spouse. Furthermore, this perspective aligns perfectly with the needs of contemporary society and general policies aimed at facilitating youth marriage. In contrast, restrictive views and the laws derived from them, besides suffering from weak jurisprudential evidence, result in unjust social consequences and inconsistency with macro-level state policies. Therefore, a modern re-reading of jurisprudential evidence through a justice-oriented approach is an effective step toward reforming the family legal system and realizing the human rights of prudent girls."
کلیدواژهها [English]