نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
حوزه علمیه قم
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Ensuring public health depends on the purity of the food sources that constitute the foundation of human physical and spiritual development. In recent decades, the livestock industry, aiming to reduce costs and compensate for dependence on imported inputs, has turned to using bone meal as a mineral-rich supplement. This article, adopting a descriptive-analytical approach and utilizing library studies and field observations in slaughterhouses and industrial units, seeks to answer the question: What is the prescriptive ruling on feeding this substance to halal meat animals from the perspective of Imamiyyah jurisprudence? The research findings indicate that the common production processes of bone meal merely cause a physical change and do not constitute instances of jurisprudential transformation; therefore, assuming the original substance was impure, the bone meal retains its impurity status, and feeding it to livestock and poultry falls under the category of feeding an impure substance. However, the analogical reasoning derived from the evidence prohibiting the feeding of impurities such as urine and wine is incomplete and does not establish the prescriptive prohibition of bone meal. Consequently, if the source is not porcine, an obligatory prohibition cannot be established, and only if the principle of tolerance in the evidence for recommended practices is accepted, a ruling of dislike is inferred. However, if the source of the bone meal is porcine, and feeding it leads to the animal's flesh and bone being strengthened and developed, then in addition to the prescriptive prohibition of the act of feeding, the meat and offspring of that animal would also be perpetually forbidden. Moreover, the designation jallal does not apply to feeding with slaughterhouse by products, since these meals are not instances of 'adhrat.
کلیدواژهها [English]