نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 سطح دو حوزه علمیه خواهران، دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق جزا دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی
2 دکتری حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی
3 کارشاناسی ارشد حقوق کیفری اطفال و نوجوانان دانشگاه علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
This article examines the status of the right of retention in marriages under the Dowry and the Dowry in Imami jurisprudence and Iranian law. The main issue is whether the wife in a marriage under the Dowry or the Dowry, that is, where the dowry is not mentioned in the contract or its determination is postponed until after the contract, can she refrain from performing marital duties until the dowry is determined and delivered? This research, using a descriptive-analytical method and a comparative approach in Imami jurisprudence and Iranian law, first examines and analyzes different jurisprudential and legal perspectives in this field. In Imami jurisprudence, some jurists believe in the existence of the right of retention for the wife in this type of marriage, while others deny it. In Iranian law, the civil law is also not explicit in this regard, and the interpreters of the civil law also have different opinions in this regard. Finally, this research, by examining the evidence and jurisprudential and legal principles, concludes that the right of detention for the wife in the marriage of the dowry trustee and the dowry trustee cannot be proven. This conclusion is justified with regard to jurisprudential rules such as no harm and negation of hardship and hardship, as well as with regard to legal principles such as the principle of strengthening the family and the applicability of Article 1085 of the Civil Code.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]